![]() |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | ![]() |
Display Modes | ![]() |
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Status: Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 15
06 -0600, "HeyBub" <heybub@NOSPAMgmail.com>wrote: >No. First, we don't guard the borders of any other country. Two, we don't >have enough military to guard our border period. During the Battle of the >Bulge, the 101st Airborne division held 21 miles of the front. At the same >density, it would take over 100 divisions of infantry to guard our southern >border. The authorized strength of the US Army and Marines is ten divisions. Well, help is on the way. The One has promised to create a "civilian defense force" with MORE POWER than the army. But since his cabinet is retread klintonistas that loathe the military, what we will end up with is an army of SOCIAL WORKERS. This army will inhabit the border region and consult with the illegals to determine why their "needs" are not being met by their former country and design "programs" that will meet those needs. And lobby for UN support. There will be losses when the new PC Army runs up against the Zetas, armed with REAL Ak's. But at least the PC Army won't have guns that could be used against them. >I somewhat agree. If we exported more jobs to Mexico, the northern flight >would stop. But no, now the Democrats want to TAX companies that move >offshore. I don't know. If I drive up to a McDonalds and order a Big Mac, it will be cold by the time they drive it up from Mexico. |
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Status: Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Dec 26, 3:15*pm, "HeyBub" <hey...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> az willie wrote: > > >> The real question would be how difficult would it be to control our > >> own borders to keep illegal invaders out unless we give them > >> permission to come on in? > > > =========== > > Not difficult at all --- if the politicians in Washington wanted to do > > it. > > > We send troops halfway around the world to guard the borders of other > > countries but refuse to guard our own because that would intefere with > > the importation of cheaper labor. > > No. First, we don't guard the borders of any other country. Two, we don't > have enough military to guard our border period. During the Battle of the > Bulge, the 101st Airborne division held 21 miles of the front. At the same > density, it would take over 100 divisions of infantry to guard our southern > border. The authorized strength of the US Army and Marines is ten divisions. > All it would take is a few Apache choppers, with night vision, patrolling the border ready and willing to shoot. Very soon they would stop coming, except maybe one or for two a week. And nobody would care about that. > > > We have exported ( outsourced ) the jobs that could be exported easily > > ... so now, since we can't export some jobs our benevolent > > corporations want to import cheaper labor and they pay our > > politicians well to make sure the army doesn't get stationed on the > > border with shoot to kill orders as they have when we deploy them to > > many other countries. > > We don't have a military presence (over and above Marine embassy guards) in > over 80 countries just so we can avoid putting them on our border. > > > > > We could stop the invasion quite easily ... but the powers that be > > don't want to. Simple as that. > > I somewhat agree. If we exported more jobs to Mexico, the northern flight > would stop. But no, now the Democrats want to TAX companies that move > offshore. > > > > > And it makes no difference whether we put Democrats or Republicans in > > power. Both parties are owned body and soul by corporations. > > But corporations don't vote. It's a balancing act. |
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Status: Guest
Posts: n/a
|
HeyBub wrote:
> Fiftycal@abcnnbcbs.com wrote: >> I don't know. If I drive up to a McDonalds and order a Big Mac, it >> will be cold by the time they drive it up from Mexico. > > Boy are you behind the times! > > If you drive through a Wendy's, McDonalds, or Burger King, your order could > be taken by the friendly menu-consultant in NEW HAMPSHIRE! > > Once the bugs are worked out, you can expect the call center to be relocated > to India (or Mexico). > > http://www.boston.com/business/globe...have_a_burger/ > > While the bugs are being worked out, you can enjoy your burger made by a Mexican with drug resistant tuberculosis. |
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Status: Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"HeyBub" <heybub@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message news:O5Sdnc9cG5hoOMjUnZ2dnUVZ_orinZ2d@earthlink.co m... > johnny@. wrote: >> HeyBub wrote: >>> Fiftycal@abcnnbcbs.com wrote: >>>> I don't know. If I drive up to a McDonalds and order a Big Mac, it >>>> will be cold by the time they drive it up from Mexico. >>> >>> Boy are you behind the times! >>> >>> If you drive through a Wendy's, McDonalds, or Burger King, your >>> order could be taken by the friendly menu-consultant in NEW >>> HAMPSHIRE! Once the bugs are worked out, you can expect the call center >>> to be >>> relocated to India (or Mexico). >>> >>> http://www.boston.com/business/globe...have_a_burger/ >>> >>> >> >> While the bugs are being worked out, you can enjoy your burger made >> by a Mexican with drug resistant tuberculosis. > > Uh, I don't think the immigration folks will let you enter the country > with a contagious disease. Assuming that they enter legally....... |
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Status: Guest
Posts: n/a
|
never@millions.com wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 21 46 GMT, "Scout"> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote: > >> "HeyBub" <heybub@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message >> news:O5Sdnc9cG5hoOMjUnZ2dnUVZ_orinZ2d@earthlink.co m... > >>> Uh, I don't think the immigration folks will let you enter the country >>> with a contagious disease. >> Assuming that they enter legally....... >> > > And that is yet another reason for a legal, fair and orderly process > for protecting the borders. > > DCI What do you consider an illegal process for protecting our border? |
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Status: Guest
Posts: n/a
|
never@millions.com wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 17 08 -0600, "johnny@." <johnny@.> wrote:> >> never@millions.com wrote: >>> On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 21 46 GMT, "Scout">>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote: >>> >>>> "HeyBub" <heybub@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message >>>> news:O5Sdnc9cG5hoOMjUnZ2dnUVZ_orinZ2d@earthlink.co m... >>>>> Uh, I don't think the immigration folks will let you enter the country >>>>> with a contagious disease. >>>> Assuming that they enter legally....... >>>> >>> And that is yet another reason for a legal, fair and orderly process >>> for protecting the borders. >>> >>> DCI >> What do you consider an illegal process for protecting our border? > > > Your statement makes no sense. Clarify, please. > > DCI You said: "And that is yet another reason for a legal, fair and orderly process for protecting the borders". Would you consider putting the military on the border an illegal process to control illegal immigration? |
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Status: Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Stephan Rothstein" <srothstein@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:YaCdnVgO9dgySsvUnZ2dnUVZ_qDinZ2d@earthlink.co m... > Phxbrd wrote: >> "Stephan Rothstein" <srothstein@earthlink.net> wrote in message >> news:5Mmdnd4WD-vegsjUnZ2dnUVZ_jydnZ2d@earthlink.com... >>> Phxbrd wrote: >>> >>>> Gringos arrived here thousands of years after the first setttlers. Now >>>> we think the country didn't exist until we got here. Is that ugly >>>> racism or what? >>>> >>> >>> This is provable fact. The United States of America did not exist until >>> July, 1776. This is well after the documented arrival of "gringos" to >>> this continent. >>> >>> So, where is the racism in this statement of fact? >>> >>> Steve Rothstein >> >> >> I rest my case. >> > > I figured you would rest your lack of a case since it is clearly not > proven or provable. > > How can a statement of fact be racist? Which part of my statement is not > fact? > > Steve Rothstein Gringos arrived here thousands of years after the first setttlers. |
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Status: Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 00
03 -0800, Billy <wildbilly@without_a.net>wrote: >You may have hit on something. If we stopped selling taxpayer subsidized >commodities, like corn, in Mexico for less than it costs us to produce >it, more Mexicans would have jobs. So we are "giving" corn away? To what end? Oh, and corn costs between $.80 and $1.40 a bushel to produce, given the right weather. It got up to $8.00 a bushel before the "ethanol" bubble burst. |
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Status: Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"HeyBub" <heybub@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message news:O5Sdnc9cG5hoOMjUnZ2dnUVZ_orinZ2d@earthlink.co m... > johnny@. wrote: >> HeyBub wrote: >>> Fiftycal@abcnnbcbs.com wrote: >>>> I don't know. If I drive up to a McDonalds and order a Big Mac, it >>>> will be cold by the time they drive it up from Mexico. >>> >>> Boy are you behind the times! >>> >>> If you drive through a Wendy's, McDonalds, or Burger King, your >>> order could be taken by the friendly menu-consultant in NEW >>> HAMPSHIRE! Once the bugs are worked out, you can expect the call center >>> to be >>> relocated to India (or Mexico). >>> >>> http://www.boston.com/business/globe...have_a_burger/ >>> >>> >> >> While the bugs are being worked out, you can enjoy your burger made >> by a Mexican with drug resistant tuberculosis. > > Uh, I don't think the immigration folks will let you enter the country > with a contagious disease. > You'd think so. However, a German girl waiting for her American boyfriend to send for her had the good sense to screw me - twice - and gave me the clap both times. I went back for thirds only to find that she now lived in Shaker Heights; one ot the wealthiest communities in America at the time. |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|