Welcome to the www.LakerForums.com.
Header

www.LakerForums.com » Other » California Talk » Re: Anti-marriage bullying = 'epitome of intolerance'

Reply
LinkBack Thread Tools vBmenu Seperating Image Display Modes vBmenu Seperating Image
Re: Anti-marriage bullying = 'epitome of intolerance'
Old 12-26-2008, 12:00 PM   #1 (permalink)
Dionisio
Guest
 
Status: Guest
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Anti-marriage bullying = 'epitome of intolerance'

Rudy Canoza wrote:

> No, I do not. I argue against your attempt to destroy America under a
> phony "civil rights" smokescreen. You don't support civil rights; you
> support the state.


<LOL!> "I'm not arguing against civil rights, I'm arguing for the state to kowtow to my
Theocratic wet dreams!"


--
And the Thought of the Moment (TM) is:

"There are no acts of love between adults, that one can or should condemn."
-- The Dali Lama, 24 May 1996

(Brought to you by SigChanger. http://www.phranc.nl)
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2008, 02:00 PM   #2 (permalink)
Syd
Guest
 
Status: Guest
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Anti-marriage bullying = 'epitome of intolerance'

On Dec 26, 1:49*pm, Dionisio <moc.rr.thighi...@5ellimd.com> wrote:
> Rudy Canoza wrote:
> > No, I do not. *I argue against your attempt to destroy America under a
> > phony "civil rights" smokescreen. *You don't support civil rights; you
> > support the state.

>
> <LOL!> "I'm not arguing against civil rights, I'm arguing for the state to kowtow to my
> Theocratic wet dreams!"
>


LOL! Pretty much.

PDW
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2008, 09:35 PM   #3 (permalink)
Dionisio
Guest
 
Status: Guest
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Anti-marriage bullying = 'epitome of intolerance'

Ray Fischer wrote:
> You're just arguing that nobody has any civil right unless you agree
> with it.


The fatal flaw in your response was the assumption that there was thinking taking place on
Rudy's part.

Otherwise, it was a "dead-on" observation.

:-)


--
And the Thought of the Moment (TM) is:

In 'The Screwtape Letters', C.S. Lewis describes the strategy of the Devil for corrupting
a Christian: 'Let him begin by treating patriotism as part of his religion. Then let him,
under the influence of partisan spirit, come to reguard it as the most important part.
Then quietly and gradually nurse him on to the stage at which the religion becomes merely
a part of the "cause," in which Christianity is valued chiefly because of the excellent
arguments it can produce.'

(Brought to you by SigChanger. http://www.phranc.nl)
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2008, 09:35 PM   #4 (permalink)
Dionisio
Guest
 
Status: Guest
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Anti-marriage bullying = 'epitome of intolerance'

never@millions.com wrote:
> On 28 Dec 2008 0313 GMT, rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>You're just arguing that nobody has any civil right unless you agree
>>with it.

>
> How about a civil obligation?


Rudy?!? Responsible enough to honor -- let alone acknowledge -- obligations (civil or
otherwise)?!?

"Please pee into the little cup and hand it to the lab technician. Thank you."


--
And the Thought of the Moment (TM) is:

"Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who
matter don't mind."
--Dr. Seuss

(Brought to you by SigChanger. http://www.phranc.nl)
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2008, 12:00 AM   #5 (permalink)
Syd
Guest
 
Status: Guest
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Anti-marriage bullying = 'epitome of intolerance'

On Dec 27, 11:27*pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@thedismalscience.noot> wrote:
> Ray Fischer wrote:
> > Rudy Canoza *<pie...@frankreich.fr> wrote:
> >> Dionisio wrote:
> >>> Rudy Canoza wrote:

>
> >>>> No, I do not. *I argue against your attempt to destroy America under a
> >>>> phony "civil rights" smokescreen. *You don't support civil rights;you
> >>>> support the state.
> >>> <LOL!> "I'm not arguing against civil rights..."
> >> Correct - I'm not.

>
> > You're just arguing that nobody has any civil right

>
> No, that's bullshit - I said no such thing.


Oh, yes you did.

PDW
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2008, 01:00 PM   #6 (permalink)
Syd
Guest
 
Status: Guest
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Anti-marriage bullying = 'epitome of intolerance'

On Dec 28, 2:21*am, Rudy Canoza <pi...@thedismalscience.noot> wrote:
> Syd (queer) lied:
>
> > On Dec 27, 11:27 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@thedismalscience.noot> wrote:
> >> Ray Fischer wrote:
> >>> Rudy Canoza *<pie...@frankreich.fr> wrote:
> >>>> Dionisio wrote:
> >>>>> Rudy Canoza wrote:
> >>>>>> No, I do not. *I argue against your attempt to destroy America under a
> >>>>>> phony "civil rights" smokescreen. *You don't support civil rights; you
> >>>>>> support the state.
> >>>>> <LOL!> "I'm not arguing against civil rights..."
> >>>> Correct - I'm not.
> >>> You're just arguing that nobody has any civil right
> >> No, that's bullshit - I said no such thing.

>
> > Oh, yes you did.

>
> No, I didn't.


Yes, you did; You said clearly that only people who are like you
should have civil rights.

PDW
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:42 PM.

Powered by VBulletin Torrent Tracker 3.0 by StRaYeR